SR 32 Relocation Feasibility Study (March 2012)
The Feasibility Study, following ODOT’s new Project Development Process (PDP), evaluates the preliminary alternatives carried over from Tier 1 (see the Tier 1 DEIS) and makes recommendations about corridors to be advanced for further study – as shown on Figure 17 Alternative Corridors Recommended for Advancement. No decisions on the location of specific alignments or a preferred alternative have been made. The corridors depicted on all of the maps in the Feasibility Study are preliminary, some of which have been eliminated from further consideration by the Feasibility Study, or continue to be refined. The yellow shaded area on Figure 17 represents the broad area in which more detailed alternatives will be developed and evaluated as the next step in the study process. Preliminary impacts reported in the Feasibility Study were calculated for broad corridors, and will also continue to be updated as alternatives are refined and avoidance and minimization measures are further developed.
Information included in the Feasibility Study will be presented for public review and comment at a Public Meeting being planned for the Summer of 2012. The meeting date and location will be posted on the Upcoming Opportunities page when available. You can also provide comments on the Feasibility Study anytime through the Submit Feedback page of this website.
Eastern Corridor Segment II-III Feasibility Study Report (main document- figures, tables and appendix below)
Figure 3 - Project Location
Figure 4 - Study Area Subareas & Alternatives
Figure 5 - Typical Sections
Figure 6 - Community & Land Use Features
Figure 8 - Potential Displacements
Figure 9 - Floodplain and Floodway
Figure 10 - Drinking Water Resources
Figure 11 - Ecologial Resources
Figure 12 - History Architecture Resources
Figure 13 - Archaeological Sensitivity
Figure 14 - Public Parks and Greenspaces
Figure 15 - Hazardous Materials Concerns
Figure 16 - Engineering and Design Considerations
Figure 17 - Alternative Corridors Recommended for Advancement
Figure 18 - Recommended Alternative Corridors with Environmental Features
Table 11 - US 50-Red Bank Subarea Matrix
Table 12 - River Crossing Subarea Matrix
Table 13- River Plains Subarea Matrix
Table 14 - Newtown Subarea Matrix
Table 15 - Mt. Carmel Subarea Matrix
References
Appendix B Eastern Corridor LUVP and GIP
Appendix B1 - 2002 Land Use Vision Plan Summary Excerpts
Appendix B2 - 2005 Green Infrastructure Master Plan Summary
Appendix C Eastern Corridor Tier 1 Purpose and Need
Appendix C1 - Eastern Corridor Tier 1 Purpose and Need
Appendix C2 - Eastern Corridor Tier 1 Purpose and Need Exhibits
Appendix D Eastern Corridor Tier 1 Environmental Commitments
Appendix E Eastern Corridor Tier 1 No Build
Appendix F Environmental Resources Support Materials
Appendix F1 - Soil and Bedrock Mapping and Archived Geological Data
Appendix F2 - Environmental Justice
Appendix F3 - OEPA Drinking Water Map
Appendix F4 - Detailed Ecological Mapping
Appendix G Cost Estimates
Appendix G1 - Construction Cost Estimates
Appendix G2 - ROW Cost Estimates
Appendix H Public Involvement
Appendix H1 - Meeting Minutes - Local Jurisdiction Meetings (2008)
Appendix H2 - Land Use Vision Plan Update Summary (2009)
Appendix H3 - Segment II-III Public Involvement Plan Update Summary
Appendix H4 - Tribal Coordination Summary (2011)
Appendix I Supporting Studies (these files are all large and may require additional download time)
Appendix I1 - Ecological Resources Inventory Report (2008)
Appendix I2 - Environmental Site Assessment Screening (2008)
Appendix I3a - LMR Hydraulics Phase 1 (2009)
Appendix I3b - LMR Hydraulics Phase 2 (2009)
Appendix I4a - LMR Geomorphology Phase 1 (2009)
Appendix I4b - LMR Geomorphology Phase 2 (2009)
Appendix I5 - History-Architecture Red Flag Summary (2009)
Appendix I6 - Archaeological Modeling Study (2009)
Appendix I7 - Preliminary Noise Screening Report (2009)
Appendix I8 - Archaeology Literature Review and Disturbance Report (2010)
